Protection for Your Derivative Works
Legal Article GuideBy: Carolyn Wright
Here’s the issue: you photograph a car for the manufacturer in 2004 and register the photo with U.S. Copyright Office. In 2005, the car maker produces the same car except with a different style of wheels. The client asks you to shoot only the new wheels and add them to the original photo using Photoshop. The new photo then will be distributed. Do you need to register the new photograph to obtain full statutory copyright protection? You do if it would qualify as a derivative work.
As the owner of a copyright, you have complete and exclusive control to do a variety of things to your photograph, including the right to prepare derivative works based on the original image. But when you alter a work, it’s a judgment call as to whether it constitutes a derivative work or is only a minor variation of the original work.
A derivative work is one that is based on one or more earlier works. Derivative works include editorial revisions, annotations or other modifications. A derivative work must be different enough from the original to be regarded a new work – in other words, it must contain some substantial, not merely trivial, originality. Making minor changes or additions of little substance to a preexisting work will not make it a new version for copyright purposes.
One of the tests to decide whether the new work is a derivative work is whether the new material is original and copyrightable in itself. Note that, for reasons not covered here, the standard of originality is higher for derivative works than it is for those not based on preexisting works. If your photo meets the definition of a derivative work, it must be registered for full statutory protection. If the photo only is slightly modified and does not qualify as a derivative work, then the original registration covers the work.
In the case cited above, since the photograph of the wheels may be considered original and copyrightable itself, adding it to the original photograph probably makes it a new work. For the most protection, registering the new work is the safest bet.
Take my advice; get professional help.
PhotoAttorney
Copyright 2005 Carolyn E. Wright All Rights Reserved
--- ABOUT THE AUTHOR ---
Carolyn E. Wright, Esq., has a unique legal practice aimed squarely at the needs of photographers. A pro photographer herself, Carolyn has the credentials and the experience to protect photographers. She’s represented clients in multimillion dollar litigations, but also has the desire to help new photographers just starting their careers. Carolyn graduated from Emory University School of Law with a Juris Doctor, and from Tennessee Tech Univ. with a Masters of Business Administration degree and a Bachelor of Science degree in music.
She wrote the book on photography law. “88 Secrets to the Law for Photographers," by Carolyn and well-known professional photographer, Scott Bourne, is scheduled for fall 2005 release by Olympic Mountain School Press. Carolyn also is a columnist for PhotoFocus Magazine.
Carolyn specializes in wildlife photography and her legal website is http://www.photoattorney.com
Related Articles:
Leave a comment to Protection for Your Derivative Works
No Responses to Protection for Your Derivative Works
(From 0 Votes)
Latest 5 Legal Guide
Franchise Agreements and Attorney Trickery
Article by: Lance Winslow
Often a franchisee who has failed to uphold their promises...
Celebrex Class Action Suits -
Article by: Carl Spanier
The first Celebrex class action suit to be filed is...
What Are Death Records?
Article by: Amit Mehta
Death records are the last and final public records available...
The 'Coarse Conversation' of Tucker
Article by: Jonathan Frieden
In June, the United States District Court for the Eastern...
Access to E-records by Taxing
Article by: Adil Waseem
All tax authorities to e-commerce transactions should investigate the record...














