Practical vs. Legal - Getting Model and Property Releases

Legal Article Guide
By: Carolyn Wright


Depending on the circumstance, a model or property release may not be legally necessary. But getting one never hurts and it may help. It may make some people think that they can't sue you (they can, even if their cause of action is bogus). If they do sue you, having a release may shorten the litigation and it could help you win. Even when you win, though, your defense fees can be costly.

In those situations when a release is not required, other legal issues may be presented when photographing a person, an animal or other property. These include trespassing, trademark, false light or invasion of privacy. All of this can get confusing. That's also why it's dangerous to take anecdotal advice.

For example, if one person has a fashion shoot in a national park and needs a permit, it does not mean that all professional photographers who shoot in a national park need a permit. While some stock agencies may require a property release for an animal photo, it does not mean that it's legally required. It means that they are being cautious in this litigious society.

I recently photographed some huskies at a public park. I wasn’t trespassing on public property, the dogs are not trademarked and I did not misrepresent them (also known as “false light”) in my photos. Further, since animals don't have privacy rights like humans do, I did not need to get a model or property release from their owner. But I got one anyway. I asked the owner in writing for permission to use the photos. I did that that only to keep the owner from getting upset and to avoid any hassle with a stock or advertising agency.

What is often practical is not always legally required. To figure out the differences and to make the best decisions about what to do, talk to an attorney to discuss your particular situations.

Take my advice; get professional help.

PhotoAttorney

Copyright 2005 Carolyn E. Wright All Rights Reserved

--- ABOUT THE AUTHOR ---

Carolyn E. Wright, Esq., has a unique legal practice aimed squarely at the needs of photographers. A pro photographer herself, Carolyn has the credentials and the experience to protect photographers. She’s represented clients in multimillion dollar litigations, but also has the desire to help new photographers just starting their careers. Carolyn graduated from Emory University School of Law with a Juris Doctor, and from Tennessee Tech Univ. with a Masters of Business Administration degree and a Bachelor of Science degree in music.

She wrote the book on photography law. “88 Secrets to the Law for Photographers," by Carolyn and well-known professional photographer, Scott Bourne, is scheduled for fall 2005 release by Olympic Mountain School Press. Carolyn also is a columnist for PhotoFocus Magazine.

Carolyn specializes in wildlife photography and her legal website is http://www.photoattorney.com


Bookmark & Share Articles:


Related Articles:

  • The Lemon Law in California - What are the Consumer Benefits?
  • Lemon Laws and Extended Warranties -- What You Should Know
  • Franchisee Attorney Tricks in Litigation
  • Identity Theft Monitoring Agencies
  • Getting Divorced? You Have Options
  • Obtaining Social Security Disability: How To Begin The Process
  • Getting the Right Answers to Your Legal Questions
  • What Happens at a Social Security Hearing in Virginia?
  • Defending Against Class Action Suits In The World Of Sarbox
  • Atlanta Business Lawyers

  • Leave a comment to Practical vs. Legal - Getting Model and Property Releases

    • Name (required)
    • Mail (required but not published)
    • Comment / Rate this hotel
      Terrible
      Fair
      Okay
      Good
      Excellent
    • Please enter:  


    No Responses to Practical vs. Legal - Getting Model and Property Releases

    Average Rating: (From 0 Votes)


    Search Thousands of Court Records

    Latest 5 Legal Guide